Family

America’s eldercare crisis is a family-formation crisis

On Oct. 14, 2026, IFS warned that population aging and declining family formation will leave more people needing care and fewer younger people to provide it.

Image via census.gov

America's eldercare crisis is a family-formation crisis: as marriage and fertility fall, more people will need care and fewer younger people will be available to provide it. On Oct. 14, 2026, the Institute for Family Studies posted Autumn Zeoli's essay "Rethinking Eldercare: Why We Need Family More Than Ever." Zeoli is an IFS intern and a Master of Public Policy candidate at the University of Virginia1.

The institute's warning on X was blunt: "We are approaching a crisis of dependency; the alarm bells should be ringing." It tied population aging to "plummeting marriage rates, the sex recession, and declining fertility2." Zeoli projects: “By 2035, there will be more people age 65 or older than under the age of 18.”1 The family stakes are immediate: Zeoli reports that “more than 80% of Americans over 65 rely on care provided by family and friends.” Stephanie Murray warns, “Many Americans assume that if they can afford paid help in older age, they won’t need to rely on kin. They’re wrong.”

Open original source

Fewer young people will provide care

The institute's arithmetic is plain: "there will be more people who will need care and far fewer younger people available to provide it2." Zeoli writes that the median age of Americans "now sits at 39.4 years." That shift leaves fewer younger people available to care for aging parents. She also cites a 2026 Social Security analysis that names the cause: "The number one contributor to the social security crisis? Fertility1."

Washington hears a budget problem. Zeoli sees a larger loss, arguing that "potential economic troubles and labor shortages pale in comparison to the emotional and psychological ramifications of population aging1." Fewer children today means fewer sons and daughters at a parent's bedside tomorrow. Who answers the phone for the widow whose only child lives three states away, or who never had one?

Paid care does not replace family

." More than four in five older Americans rely on family and friends for care1, Zeoli reports; paid services cannot replace the relatives and friends who provide that support.

Paid help falls short, Stephanie Murray says, because of "the unpredictable nature of aging, senior resistance to professional care, and the fact that care often requires coordination by a family member1."

The Census Bureau reports that in 2024 about 2.6 million parents provided $26.6 billion in financial support to 3.7 million adult children age 21 and over who did not live at home3.

Japan shows the cost of isolation

Japan shows where an aging society with thin family ties ends up. Zeoli’s comparison shows Japan has a much older population: about 30% of its residents are seniors, compared with 18% in the United States. "Roughly 30% of bodies were discovered eight or more days after passing away1."

Japan has a word for it: "kodokushi," meaning lonely or solitary death. Zeoli adds that "a significant portion of Japanese elderly live in poverty1."

Make family formation possible again

Zeoli's conclusion is Family Brief's: "Strong families, marriages, and communities are not an archaic method of approaching elder care; they are the foundations we need to solve the problem." She argues that "marriage, children, extended family, and stable community should not be viewed as a mere personal preference or a luxury by young adults." The hope is still there: "Dating is at a record low. Still, marriage has not totally disappeared from young adults’ aspirations1."

If this great American experiment is to continue, we must once again put the family first.

American Principles ProjectRead it in Family First: Reclaiming the GOP's Forgotten Constituency (American Principles Project, 2019) ↗

Lawmakers should meet that hope with policy. They should strip the marriage penalties out of tax and benefit programs, raise the child tax credit, and lower the housing and living costs that push marriage and children later. They should judge every economic plan by whether it helps families form.

A lawmaker who shrugs at falling marriage and birth rates is deciding who will be alone at the end of life. Before the next vote, ask every candidate and officeholder what they will do to make marriage and children achievable for young couples, and whether they will vote for it.

Sources

  1. The Future of Eldercare Begins With Family
  2. @FamStudies on X, 2026-10-14: America is getting older. The median age of Americans now sits at 39.4 years. Known as population aging, this trend, combined with plummeting marriage rates, the sex recession, and declining fertility, spells out a daunting fate. Put plainly, there will be mor, 2026-10-14
  3. Census.gov | U.S. Census Bureau Homepage

FAMILY BRIEF The news and network for the American family.

Talk about this story with FAMILY BRIEF members

Help us report family news

236 stories40 statesin the last 30 days

Family Brief members report what's happening where they live and help expose the enemies of the family.

Become a member

Up next: From Terry Schilling

Terry SchillingPresident, American Principles ProjectThe American Family Finally Has Its Own ChampionThe American family has been under siege for decades—economically, legally, politically, and culturally.Read the story

Keep reading