TikTok allegedly left kids with a fake safety reset
New York’s lawsuit says children who sought a reset saw unchanged feeds, raising a question parents cannot ignore: can they trust the safety tools on their children’s phones?
New York alleges TikTok gave thousands of users, including children and teens, nonworking “ghost” versions of its safety features. Algo Refresh is designed to reset recommendations for users seeking to remove unwanted or harmful content1.
According to the suit, users who thought the tool was working saw nothing change1. The allegations appeared in an updated, sealed version of Attorney General Letitia James’ 2024 lawsuit, which a judge later ordered unsealed2. When parents tell children to reset a feed, they trust the button to do what it says. That trust is the household stake here.
The Independent reports that the unsealed court documents allege thousands of account holders who tried to turn on a safety setting were given a placebo version that did not work1. The Verge describes the blocked feature as an option to reset your algorithm, which can potentially help users avoid harmful content in their feed. Per Reuters, as relayed by The Verge, those users believed they had activated the feature2.
The suit does not describe a glitch; it describes an experiment. New York says TikTok repeatedly ran the experiments on thousands of users throughout 2023. The lawsuit claims the company compared users deprived of the working feature against those who received it, to study engagement time and advertising revenue1.
Inside the company, a Digital Well Being product manager objected, according to the suit1. The manager warned that a placebo group conflicted with the tool’s purpose of giving users algorithmic transparency and control.
The suit adds that TikTok misled users by presenting Algo Refresh as a permanent reset rather than a temporary one2. If an employee could see the conflict, why did the tests allegedly continue through the year?
A reset button that does not reset is not a parental control. A parent who points a child to that tool is trusting a control the suit says was withheld from some users. The family is prior to the platform, and a company that experiments on the very control a household reaches for has taken the decision out of the household's hands.
Bloomberg first reported a second set of tests described in the unsealed documents, in which TikTok randomly disabled safety settings meant to limit exposure to dangerous material. The report said a teenage boy in New York who was part of that test died by suicide. The court filing says internal assessments found he had been shown an “onslaught” of material concerning suicide and self-harm1.
New York's case is one of more than two dozen state lawsuits charging TikTok with engineering its platform to foster addiction among children and misleading the public about safety3. Legal filings contend that while TikTok says safety is paramount, it deliberately blocked certain groups from safety tools even when users explicitly sought to avoid harmful content1. For parents, the question is larger than one reset button: whether any safety setting on a child's phone can be taken at its word.
TikTok's answer is that testing is routine. Spokesperson Nathaniel Brown told The Verge: "We continuously make improvements to our platform which means that, like most companies, we regularly test new products and features to validate the experience and understand how they work in the real world2." The company also maintains that the claims mischaracterize how Algo Refresh works, and in court filings it has largely rejected New York's claims, saying protecting younger users remains a core focus1.
That reply answers a charge nobody made. Testing a new layout is one thing; the suit alleges TikTok gave users who asked for protection a version that did not work, and then measured the result. Like most companies, TikTok tests products, but most companies do not tell a child a feed has been reset when it has not.
Self-policing has failed these families. Parental authority over a child's online life means little if the tools handed to parents are controlled by the platform that profits from the child's attention.
New York's complaint seeks injunctive relief4. Parents and lawmakers should demand enforceable safety duties, independent audits and the right to know what platforms do to their children’s feeds.
A parent who helps a child tap a reset button is exercising authority, and New York alleges that for some users the button changed nothing1. Parents should not wait for a verdict to decide what they will accept: protections that work the same for every child, checked by someone other than the company that profits from the feed, and disclosed to the people raising that child.
Sources
- TikTok gave kids a placebo safety tool in secret experiment, New York lawsuit says | The Independent
- New York accuses TikTok of serving users ‘placebo’ safety features | The Verge
- TikTok Reaches First State Settlement Over Teen Safety Claims, Agrees to User Limits
- COMPLAINT Index No. 452749/2024 IAS Part
FAMILY BRIEF The news and network for the American family.
